netdev - [PATCH net-next] ppp: remove unnecessary bh disable in xmit path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1496311119-59204-1-git-send-email-gfree.wind@vip.163.com>
Date:   Thu,  1 Jun 2017 17:58:39 +0800
From:   gfree.wind@....163.com
To:     paulus@...ba.org, linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org, g.nault@...halink.fr,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Gao Feng <gfree.wind@....163.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] ppp: remove unnecessary bh disable in xmit path

From: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@....163.com>

Since the commit 55454a565836 ("ppp: avoid dealock on recursive xmit"),
the PPP xmit path is protected by wrapper functions which disable the
bh already. So it is unnecessary to disable the bh again in the real
xmit path.

Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <gfree.wind@....163.com>
---
 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
index f9c0e62..bbded33 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
@@ -1618,7 +1618,7 @@ static void ppp_xmit_process(struct ppp *ppp)
 		list = list->next;
 		pch = list_entry(list, struct channel, clist);
 
-		spin_lock_bh(&pch->downl);
+		spin_lock(&pch->downl);
 		if (pch->chan) {
 			if (pch->chan->ops->start_xmit(pch->chan, skb))
 				ppp->xmit_pending = NULL;
@@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@ static void ppp_xmit_process(struct ppp *ppp)
 			kfree_skb(skb);
 			ppp->xmit_pending = NULL;
 		}
-		spin_unlock_bh(&pch->downl);
+		spin_unlock(&pch->downl);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1757,7 +1757,7 @@ static int ppp_mp_explode(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		}
 
 		/* check the channel's mtu and whether it is still attached. */
-		spin_lock_bh(&pch->downl);
+		spin_lock(&pch->downl);
 		if (pch->chan == NULL) {
 			/* can't use this channel, it's being deregistered */
 			if (pch->speed == 0)
@@ -1765,7 +1765,7 @@ static int ppp_mp_explode(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 			else
 				totspeed -= pch->speed;
 
-			spin_unlock_bh(&pch->downl);
+			spin_unlock(&pch->downl);
 			pch->avail = 0;
 			totlen = len;
 			totfree--;
@@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ static int ppp_mp_explode(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		 */
 		if (flen <= 0) {
 			pch->avail = 2;
-			spin_unlock_bh(&pch->downl);
+			spin_unlock(&pch->downl);
 			continue;
 		}
 
@@ -1861,14 +1861,14 @@ static int ppp_mp_explode(struct ppp *ppp, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		len -= flen;
 		++ppp->nxseq;
 		bits = 0;
-		spin_unlock_bh(&pch->downl);
+		spin_unlock(&pch->downl);
 	}
 	ppp->nxchan = i;
 
 	return 1;
 
  noskb:
-	spin_unlock_bh(&pch->downl);
+	spin_unlock(&pch->downl);
 	if (ppp->debug & 1)
 		netdev_err(ppp->dev, "PPP: no memory (fragment)\n");
 	++ppp->dev->stats.tx_errors;
@@ -1883,7 +1883,7 @@ static void __ppp_channel_push(struct channel *pch)
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	struct ppp *ppp;
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&pch->downl);
+	spin_lock(&pch->downl);
 	if (pch->chan) {
 		while (!skb_queue_empty(&pch->file.xq)) {
 			skb = skb_dequeue(&pch->file.xq);
@@ -1897,14 +1897,14 @@ static void __ppp_channel_push(struct channel *pch)
 		/* channel got deregistered */
 		skb_queue_purge(&pch->file.xq);
 	}
-	spin_unlock_bh(&pch->downl);
+	spin_unlock(&pch->downl);
 	/* see if there is anything from the attached unit to be sent */
 	if (skb_queue_empty(&pch->file.xq)) {
-		read_lock_bh(&pch->upl);
+		read_lock(&pch->upl);
 		ppp = pch->ppp;
 		if (ppp)
 			__ppp_xmit_process(ppp);
-		read_unlock_bh(&pch->upl);
+		read_unlock(&pch->upl);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1