netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] udp: avoid a cache miss on dequeue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1496313592.4872.14.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 01 Jun 2017 12:39:52 +0200
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] udp: avoid a cache miss on dequeue

On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 10:00 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-05-29 at 17:27 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > Since UDP no more uses sk->destructor, we can clear completely
> > the skb head state before enqueuing.
> 
> ...
> 
> > @@ -1739,6 +1740,9 @@ static int __udp_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >  		sk_mark_napi_id_once(sk, skb);
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	/* drop all pending head states; dst, nf and sk are dropped by caller */
> > +	secpath_reset(skb);
> > +
> 
> I wonder if using skb_release_head_state() would be more appropriate ?
> 
> Surely more descriptive and probably not more expensive since all
> cache lines should be already hot at this point.

Thank you for reviewing this.

I would prefer not adding more code to the core, but I think we would
need something new, like:

skb_reset_head_state()
{
	skb_dst_drop(skb);
        secpath_reset(skb);
        nf_reset(skb);
	skb_orphan(skb);
}

because elsewhere the skb could be in inconsistent state: skb->sp !=
NULL but with its refcount is already decremented. WDYT?

Paolo