[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a1f02849ee8e65bd8799c65c9bee622@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 23:37:13 +0200
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org,
it+linux-netdev@...gen.mpg.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: Cherry pick commit *net: better skb->sender_cpu and skb->napi_id
cohabitation* to 4.4 series?
Dear David,
On 2017-06-02 20:37, David Miller wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:51:39 -0700
>
>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
>> wrote:
>>> On 06/01/17 18:19, David Miller wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Neither of us have anything to do with the 4.4 -stable series. We
>>>> only
>>>> manage stable backport submissions for the most recent two releases.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for the prompt response. Should the netdev FAQ be updated
>>> then to
>>> contain that information?
>>
>> +1
>>
>> It is quite helpful to know which stable releases contain network
>> fixes
>> which don't, especially for those who rely on stable releases, at
>> least
>> we could do backport by ourselves when we know they are missing.
>
> The people who maintain the -stable releases older than the ones Greg
> KH
> are doing typically scan the ones that Greg applies and tries to
> integrate
> them into their -stable releases when appropriate.
My understanding is, that Greg maintains the 4.4 (LTS) and 4.9 (LTS)
series.
> If someone wants to write an accurate description of that and how it
> works,
> and add it to the FAQ, sure.
I can do that, when I understand the policy.
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists