[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD000799C@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:38:14 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Florian Westphal' <fw@...len.de>,
"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH nf-next] netns: add and use net_ns_barrier
From: Florian Westphal
> Sent: 30 May 2017 10:38
>
> Quoting Joe Stringer:
> If a user loads nf_conntrack_ftp, sends FTP traffic through a network
> namespace, destroys that namespace then unloads the FTP helper module,
> then the kernel will crash.
>
> Events that lead to the crash:
> 1. conntrack is created with ftp helper in netns x
> 2. This netns is destroyed
> 3. netns destruction is scheduled
> 4. netns destruction wq starts, removes netns from global list
> 5. ftp helper is unloaded, which resets all helpers of the conntracks
> via for_each_net()
>
> but because netns is already gone from list the for_each_net() loop
> doesn't include it, therefore all of these conntracks are unaffected.
>
> 6. helper module unload finishes
> 7. netns wq invokes destructor for rmmod'ed helper
>
...
> void
> nf_ct_iterate_destroy(int (*iter)(struct nf_conn *i, void *data), void *data)
> @@ -1734,6 +1736,13 @@ nf_ct_iterate_destroy(int (*iter)(struct nf_conn *i, void *data), void *data)
> }
> rtnl_unlock();
>
> + /* Need to wait for netns cleanup worker to finish, if its
> + * running -- it might have deleted a net namespace from
> + * the global list, so our __nf_ct_unconfirmed_destroy() might
> + * not have affected all namespaces.
> + */
> + net_ns_barrier();
> +
A problem I see is that nothing obvious guarantees that the cleanup worker
has actually started.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists