[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfaiP_Q59+iQ5ZC8O2gKOeR-gwdJpO5b05MFRdTzagR8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:43:50 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] stmmac: pci: Use dmi_system_id table for
retrieving PHY addresses
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
> Avoids reimplementation of DMI matching in stmmac_pci_find_phy_addr.
> +static const struct stmmac_pci_func_data galileo_stmmac_func_data[] = {
> {
> .func = 6,
> .phy_addr = 1,
> },
> + { },
Now this is redundant.
> +};
> +static const struct stmmac_pci_dmi_data galileo_stmmac_dmi_data = {
> + .func = galileo_stmmac_func_data,
> + .nfuncs = ARRAY_SIZE(galileo_stmmac_func_data),
It will be 2, when is supposed to be 1, see above.
> +};
> +static const struct stmmac_pci_func_data iot2040_stmmac_func_data[] = {
> + { },
> +};
> + .nfuncs = ARRAY_SIZE(iot2040_stmmac_func_data),
Ditto.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists