lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 12:04:05 +0800 From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com> To: <leedom@...lsio.com>, <ashok.raj@...el.com>, <helgaas@...nel.org>, <werner@...lsio.com>, <ganeshgr@...lsio.com>, <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>, <patrick.j.cramer@...el.com>, <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>, <Bob.Shaw@....com>, <l.stach@...gutronix.de>, <amira@...lanox.com>, <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>, <David.Laight@...lab.com>, <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>, <robin.murphy@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> CC: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] PCI: Add new PCIe Fabric End Node flag, PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING From: Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com> The new flag PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING indicates that the Relaxed Ordering Attribute should not be used on Transaction Layer Packets destined for the PCIe End Node so flagged. Initially flagged this way are Intel E5-26xx Root Complex Ports which suffer from a Flow Control Credit Performance Problem and AMD A1100 ARM ("SEATTLE") Root Complex Ports which don't obey PCIe 3.0 ordering rules which can lead to Data Corruption. Signed-off-by: Casey Leedom <leedom@...lsio.com> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com> --- drivers/pci/quirks.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c index 085fb78..58bdd23 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c @@ -3999,6 +3999,44 @@ static void quirk_tw686x_class(struct pci_dev *pdev) quirk_tw686x_class); /* + * Some devices have problems with Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed + * Ordering Attribute set. Such devices should mark themselves and other + * Device Drivers should check before sending TLPs with RO set. + */ +static void quirk_relaxedordering_disable(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ + dev->dev_flags |= PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING; +} + +/* + * Intel E5-26xx Root Complex has a Flow Control Credit issue which can + * cause performance problems with Upstream Transaction Layer Packets with + * Relaxed Ordering set. + */ +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f02, PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED, 8, + quirk_relaxedordering_disable); +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f04, PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED, 8, + quirk_relaxedordering_disable); +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x6f08, PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED, 8, + quirk_relaxedordering_disable); + +/* + * The AMD ARM A1100 (AKA "SEATTLE") SoC has a bug in its PCIe Root Complex + * where Upstream Transaction Layer Packets with the Relaxed Ordering + * Attribute clear are allowed to bypass earlier TLPs with Relaxed Ordering + * set. This is a violation of the PCIe 3.0 Transaction Ordering Rules + * outlined in Section 2.4.1 (PCI Express(r) Base Specification Revision 3.0 + * November 10, 2010). As a result, on this platform we can't use Relaxed + * Ordering for Upstream TLPs. + */ +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, 0x1a00, PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED, 8, + quirk_relaxedordering_disable); +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, 0x1a01, PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED, 8, + quirk_relaxedordering_disable); +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_CLASS_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, 0x1a02, PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED, 8, + quirk_relaxedordering_disable); + +/* * Per PCIe r3.0, sec 2.2.9, "Completion headers must supply the same * values for the Attribute as were supplied in the header of the * corresponding Request, except as explicitly allowed when IDO is used." diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index 33c2b0b..e1e8428 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h @@ -183,6 +183,8 @@ enum pci_dev_flags { PCI_DEV_FLAGS_BRIDGE_XLATE_ROOT = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 9), /* Do not use FLR even if device advertises PCI_AF_CAP */ PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_FLR_RESET = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 10), + /* Don't use Relaxed Ordering for TLPs directed at this device */ + PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 11), }; enum pci_irq_reroute_variant { -- 1.9.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists