[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170605193617.GA1936@fieldses.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 15:36:17 -0400
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: lower limit on buffer size
On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 11:17:30PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 06/02/2017 11:25 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>
> >>>commit d85b758f72b0 "virtio_net: fix support for small rings"
> >>
> >> Commit d85b758f72b0 ("virtio_net: fix support for small rings")
> >>
> >>>was supposed to increase the buffer size for small rings
> >>>but had an unintentional side effect of decreasing
> >>>it for large rings. This seems to break some setups -
> >>>it's not yet clear why, but increasing buffer size
> >>>back to what it was before helps.
> >>>
> >>>Fixes: d85b758f72b0 "virtio_net: fix support for small rings"
> >>
> >>Fixes: d85b758f72b0 ("virtio_net: fix support for small rings")
> >
> >I may be bikeshedding, but, personally I never do the parens--they're
> >redundant given the quotes, and space is often tight.
>
> Just see Documetation/process/submitting-patches.rst.
Yeah, I know, I claim it's a bad rule (but I'm too lazy to send a patch,
so, weight my opinion accordingly).
--b.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists