[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLUPR0701MB2004623B3F087A8213B2AEBF8DCA0@BLUPR0701MB2004.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:03:14 +0000
From: "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
To: Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@...lsio.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "nirranjan@...lsio.com" <nirranjan@...lsio.com>,
"kumaras@...lsio.com" <kumaras@...lsio.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] cxgb4: implement ndo_set_vf_rate()
> + pktsize = be16_to_cpu(port_rpl.u.info.mtu);
> + /* subtract ethhdr size and 4 bytes crc since, f/w appends it */
> + pktsize = pktsize - sizeof(struct ethhdr) - 4;
> + /* subtract ipv4 hdr size, tcp hdr size to get typical IPv4 MSS size */
> + pktsize = pktsize - sizeof(struct iphdr) - sizeof(struct tcphdr);
> + /* configure Traffic Class for rate-limiting */
> + ret = t4_sched_params(adap, SCHED_CLASS_TYPE_PACKET,
> + SCHED_CLASS_LEVEL_CL_RL,
> + SCHED_CLASS_MODE_CLASS,
> + SCHED_CLASS_RATEUNIT_BITS,
> + SCHED_CLASS_RATEMODE_ABS,
> + pi->port_id, class_id, 0,
> + max_tx_rate * 1000, 0, pktsize);
Does it mean you're achieving throughput limitation by
limiting the PP/s?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists