[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 16:38:27 +0200
From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com, mw@...ihalf.com,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mvpp2: do not bypass the mvpp22_port_mii_set
function
Hi Florian,
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 07:24:35AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 06:51 AM, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 03:45:35PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> >
> >> I am wondering if we shouldn't Cc: stable as well. I don't think we
> >> have seen issues on our side because U-Boot does the necessary
> >> initialization, but people using other bootloaders might have issues.
> >
> > Yes, that might be safer to cc stable. I'll do this as well.
>
> David queues network patches for stable provided that you submit those
> against his "net" tree [1] and there is an appropriate Fixes tag (which
> Thomas provided).
>
> [1]:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt#n114
That's good to know!
Thanks,
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists