netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ip_tunnel: fix potential issue in ip_tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1496891711.736.55.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Wed, 07 Jun 2017 20:15:11 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Pravin Shelar <pshelar@....org>
Cc:     Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>,
        "=David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
        Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com390e>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ip_tunnel: fix potential issue in ip_tunnel_rcv

On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 19:13 -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Haishuang Yan
> <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote:
> > When ip_tunnel_rcv fails, the tun_dst won't be freed, so move
> > skb_dst_set to begin and tun_dst would be freed by kfree_skb.
> >
> > CC: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
> > Fixes: 2e15ea390e6f ("ip_gre: Add support to collect tunnel metadata.")
> > Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com390e>
> > ---
> >  net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
> > index b878ecb..27fc20f 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.c
> > @@ -386,6 +386,9 @@ int ip_tunnel_rcv(struct ip_tunnel *tunnel, struct sk_buff *skb,
> >         const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> >         int err;
> >
> > +       if (tun_dst)
> > +               skb_dst_set(skb, (struct dst_entry *)tun_dst);
> > +
> If dst is set so early, skb_scrub_packet() would remove the tunnel dst
> reference.
> It is better to call skb_dst_drop() from error code path.

Do we really want to keep a dst from another namespace if
skb_scrub_packet() is called with xnet=true ?