[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJi3OZ4LmC-seirR=qp=caQTOf0W-zvpe=DQCK7+qwg+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 21:50:23 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>,
"=David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ip6_tunnel: fix potential issue in __ip6_tnl_rcv
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:32:44PM +0800, Haishuang Yan wrote:
>> When __ip6_tnl_rcv fails, the tun_dst won't be freed, so call
>> dst_release to free it in error code path.
>>
>> CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
>> Fixes: 8d79266bc48c ("ip6_tunnel: add collect_md mode to IPv6 tunnels")
>> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>
>
> I don't get it. Why did you send another version of the patch?
> What was wrong with previous approach that myself and Eric acked?
>
Answer lies in Pravin feedback on v2 of the patch on ipv4 side.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists