netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] net: stmmac: fix RX routing function name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170608.193057.362766079085620990.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 08 Jun 2017 19:30:57 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
        alexandre.torgue@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] net: stmmac: fix RX routing function name

A patch series should always have a proper "[PATCH 0/N] ..." header posting
explaining what the patch series is doing at a high level, how it is doing
it, and why it is doing it that way.

Thank you.