netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] qed: LL2 to use packed information for tx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170609.095943.828238777523466278.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 09 Jun 2017 09:59:43 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        Michal.Kalderon@...ium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] qed: LL2 to use packed information for tx

From: "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 07:08:54 +0000

> But one thing I thought of asking - do we consider layouts of relatively
> insignificant structures to be some golden coding standard?

It just shows lack of thought when writing things.

I want to see code that shows the author put some care into it
and didn't just slap things together.

Thank you.