[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170609.150836.1427149901008136163.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 15:08:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: chenbofeng.kernel@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fengc@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: Initial skb->dev and skb->protocol in
ip6_output
From: Chenbo Feng <chenbofeng.kernel@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 12:06:07 -0700
> From: Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
>
> Move the initialization of skb->dev and skb->protocol from
> ip6_finish_output2 to ip6_output. This can make the skb->dev and
> skb->protocol information avalaible to the CGROUP eBPF filter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Applied, thanks.
This makes ipv6 consistent with ipv4.
I am surprised this wasn't noticed, for example, in netfilter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists