[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170609.151544.817423446769306846.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 15:15:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: kafai@...com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...com, daniel@...earbox.net,
yhs@...com, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bpf: Fix test_bpf_obj_id() when the
bpf_jit_enable sysctl is diabled
From: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 22:30:16 -0700
> test_bpf_obj_id() should not expect a non zero jited_prog_len
> to be returned by bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() when
> net.core.bpf_jit_enable is 0.
>
> The patch checks for net.core.bpf_jit_enable and
> has different expectation on jited_prog_len.
>
> This patch also removes the pwd.h header which I forgot
> to remove after making changes.
>
> Fixes: 95b9afd3987f ("bpf: Test for bpf ID")
> Reported-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Applied, but please in the future provide a proper header posting
with Subject "[PATCH net-next 0/N] ...".
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists