[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d1adge1i.fsf@miraculix.mork.no>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 21:24:25 +0200
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To: Chenbo Feng <chenbofeng.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
lorenzo@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fengc@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: Initial skb->dev and skb->protocol in ip6_output
Chenbo Feng <chenbofeng.kernel@...il.com> writes:
> This patch is still under working since it may have problem with
> ip_fragment() call, did you applied it already? Should I send a revert
> patch to you then?
It does? I initially thought so too, but looking closer I believe the
ip6_copy_metadata() calls in ip6_fragment() takes care of it.
Bjørn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists