[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e187bb4-df36-1791-aa92-03a348b68b14@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 16:12:18 -0700
From: Chenbo Feng <chenbofeng.kernel@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fengc@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: Initial skb->dev and skb->protocol in
ip6_output
On 06/09/2017 12:39 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Chenbo Feng <chenbofeng.kernel@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 12:13:57 -0700
>
>>
>> On 06/09/2017 12:08 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Chenbo Feng <chenbofeng.kernel@...il.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 12:06:07 -0700
>>>
>>>> From: Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
>>>>
>>>> Move the initialization of skb->dev and skb->protocol from
>>>> ip6_finish_output2 to ip6_output. This can make the skb->dev and
>>>> skb->protocol information avalaible to the CGROUP eBPF filter.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>>> Applied, thanks.
>>>
>>> This makes ipv6 consistent with ipv4.
>>>
>>> I am surprised this wasn't noticed, for example, in netfilter.
>>> .
>>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> This patch is still under working since it may have problem with
>> ip_fragment() call, did you applied it already? Should I send a revert
>> patch to you then?
> A revert is necessary or a relative fixup.
>
> Thank you.
>
Hi David,
The revert is uploaded here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/774136/
Thanks and sorry for the trouble caused
Chenbo Feng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists