[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_dBuJKymP6tT358EEN2Qg6s+f8Sj8z-UN6ypdoDNcp-dA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:29:23 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net] net/flow: fix fc->percpu NULL pointer dereference
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> wrote:
> Now we will force to do garbage collection if any policy removed in
> xfrm_policy_flush(). But during xfrm_net_exit(). We call flow_cache_fini()
> first and set set fc->percpu to NULL. Then after we call xfrm_policy_fini()
> -> frxm_policy_flush() -> flow_cache_flush(), we will get NULL pointer
> dereference when check percpu_empty. The code path looks like:
>
> flow_cache_fini()
> - fc->percpu = NULL
> xfrm_policy_fini()
> - xfrm_policy_flush()
> - xfrm_garbage_collect()
> - flow_cache_flush()
> - flow_cache_percpu_empty()
> - fcp = per_cpu_ptr(fc->percpu, cpu)
>
> To reproduce, just add ipsec in netns and then remove the netns.
>
> v2:
> As Xin Long suggested, since only two other places need to call it. move
> xfrm_garbage_collect() outside xfrm_policy_flush().
>
> Fixes: 35db06912189 ("xfrm: do the garbage collection after flushing policy")
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
> ---
> net/key/af_key.c | 2 ++
> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 4 ----
> net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/key/af_key.c b/net/key/af_key.c
> index 512dc43..5103f92 100644
> --- a/net/key/af_key.c
> +++ b/net/key/af_key.c
> @@ -2755,6 +2755,8 @@ static int pfkey_spdflush(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct sad
> int err, err2;
>
> err = xfrm_policy_flush(net, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN, true);
> + if (!err)
> + xfrm_garbage_collect(net);
> err2 = unicast_flush_resp(sk, hdr);
> if (err || err2) {
> if (err == -ESRCH) /* empty table - old silent behavior */
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> index ed4e52d..643a18f 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> @@ -1006,10 +1006,6 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, bool task_valid)
> err = -ESRCH;
> out:
> spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
> -
> - if (cnt)
> - xfrm_garbage_collect(net);
> -
> return err;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_policy_flush);
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
> index 38614df..86116e9 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
> @@ -2027,6 +2027,7 @@ static int xfrm_flush_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> return 0;
> return err;
> }
> + xfrm_garbage_collect(net);
>
> c.data.type = type;
> c.event = nlh->nlmsg_type;
> --
> 2.5.5
>
It's a xfrm fix, pls also fix the title, like:
xfrm: move xfrm_garbage_collect out of xfrm_policy_flush
or
xfrm: fix ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists