netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: Initial skb->dev and skb->protocol in ip6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1497106613.736.105.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Sat, 10 Jun 2017 07:56:53 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc:     Chenbo Feng <chenbofeng.kernel@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        lorenzo@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fengc@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: Initial skb->dev and skb->protocol in
 ip6_output

On Fri, 2017-06-09 at 21:24 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Chenbo Feng <chenbofeng.kernel@...il.com> writes:
> 
> > This patch is still under working since it may have problem with
> > ip_fragment() call, did you applied it already? Should I send a revert
> > patch to you then?
> 
> It does? I initially thought so too, but looking closer I believe the
> ip6_copy_metadata() calls in ip6_fragment() takes care of it.

Indeed, this should be fine.