[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <edc83260e62b531a653c5c25605127972bb8693c.1497133948.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 00:50:41 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: ast@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/8] bpf: don't check spilled reg state for non-STACK_SPILLed type slots
spilled_regs[] state is only used for stack slots of type STACK_SPILL,
never for STACK_MISC. Right now, in states_equal(), even if we have
old and current stack state of type STACK_MISC, we compare spilled_regs[]
for that particular offset. Just skip these like we do everywhere else.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 14ccb07..d031b3b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2828,6 +2828,8 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return false;
if (i % BPF_REG_SIZE)
continue;
+ if (old->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL)
+ continue;
if (memcmp(&old->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE],
&cur->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE],
sizeof(old->spilled_regs[0])))
--
1.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists