netdev - Re: [pull request][net 0/6] Mellanox mlx5 fixes 2017-06-11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170611.164210.726640838112020106.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sun, 11 Jun 2017 16:42:10 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     saeedm@...lanox.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [pull request][net 0/6] Mellanox mlx5 fixes 2017-06-11

From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 17:00:22 +0300

> This series contains some fixes for the mlx5 core and netdev driver.
> 
> Please pull and let me know if there's any problem.

Pulled, thanks.

> For -stable:
> ("net/mlx5e: Added BW check for DIM decision mechanism")              kernels >= 4.9
> ("net/mlx5e: Fix wrong indications in DIM due to counter wraparound") kernels >= 4.9
> ("net/mlx5: Remove several module events out of ethtool stats")       kernels >= 4.10
> ("net/mlx5: Enable 4K UAR only when page size is bigger than 4K")     kernels >= 4.11
> 
> *all patches apply with no issue on their -stable.
> 
> BTW I never asked you if this way of marking patches to -stable is good for you ?
> if you prefer another format please let me know.

It works fine for now, I'll let you know if it causes problems :)