[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170612121342.GY2631@secunet.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 14:13:42 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net] xfrm: move xfrm_garbage_collect out of
xfrm_policy_flush
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 09:44:20AM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Now we will force to do garbage collection if any policy removed in
> xfrm_policy_flush(). But during xfrm_net_exit(). We call flow_cache_fini()
> first and set set fc->percpu to NULL. Then after we call xfrm_policy_fini()
> -> frxm_policy_flush() -> flow_cache_flush(), we will get NULL pointer
> dereference when check percpu_empty. The code path looks like:
>
> flow_cache_fini()
> - fc->percpu = NULL
> xfrm_policy_fini()
> - xfrm_policy_flush()
> - xfrm_garbage_collect()
> - flow_cache_flush()
> - flow_cache_percpu_empty()
> - fcp = per_cpu_ptr(fc->percpu, cpu)
>
> To reproduce, just add ipsec in netns and then remove the netns.
>
> v2:
> As Xin Long suggested, since only two other places need to call it. move
> xfrm_garbage_collect() outside xfrm_policy_flush().
>
> v3:
> Fix subject mismatch after v2 fix.
>
> Fixes: 35db06912189 ("xfrm: do the garbage collection after flushing policy")
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Patch applied, thanks eveyone!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists