netdev - [Patch net] net_sched: move tcf_lock down after gen_replace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1497386184-14960-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:36:24 -0700
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     nicholashuber@...il.com, labbott@...hat.com,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: [Patch net] net_sched: move tcf_lock down after gen_replace_estimator()

Laura reported a sleep-in-atomic kernel warning inside
tcf_act_police_init() which calls gen_replace_estimator() with
spinlock protection.

It is not necessary in this case, we already have RTNL lock here
so it is enough to protect concurrent writers. For the reader,
i.e. tcf_act_police(), it needs to make decision based on this
rate estimator, in the worst case we drop more/less packets than
necessary while changing the rate in parallel, it is still acceptable.

Reported-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Nick Huber <nicholashuber@...il.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
---
 net/sched/act_police.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/act_police.c b/net/sched/act_police.c
index f42008b..b062bc8 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_police.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_police.c
@@ -132,21 +132,21 @@ static int tcf_act_police_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
 		}
 	}
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&police->tcf_lock);
 	if (est) {
 		err = gen_replace_estimator(&police->tcf_bstats, NULL,
 					    &police->tcf_rate_est,
 					    &police->tcf_lock,
 					    NULL, est);
 		if (err)
-			goto failure_unlock;
+			goto failure;
 	} else if (tb[TCA_POLICE_AVRATE] &&
 		   (ret == ACT_P_CREATED ||
 		    !gen_estimator_active(&police->tcf_rate_est))) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto failure_unlock;
+		goto failure;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock_bh(&police->tcf_lock);
 	/* No failure allowed after this point */
 	police->tcfp_mtu = parm->mtu;
 	if (police->tcfp_mtu == 0) {
@@ -192,8 +192,6 @@ static int tcf_act_police_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
 
 	return ret;
 
-failure_unlock:
-	spin_unlock_bh(&police->tcf_lock);
 failure:
 	qdisc_put_rtab(P_tab);
 	qdisc_put_rtab(R_tab);
-- 
2.5.5