| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:52:13 -0700
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: <ast@...com>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: permits narrower load from bpf program context fields
Currently, verifier will reject a program if it contains an
narrower load from the bpf context structure. For example,
__u8 h = __sk_buff->hash, or
__u16 p = __sk_buff->protocol
__u32 sample_period = bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period
which are narrower loads of 4-byte or 8-byte field.
This patch solves the issue by:
. Introduce a new parameter ctx_field_size to carry the
field size of narrower load from prog type
specific *__is_valid_access validator back to verifier.
. The non-zero ctx_field_size for a memory access indicates
(1). underlying prog type specific convert_ctx_accesses
supporting non-whole-field access
(2). the current insn is a narrower or whole field access.
. In verifier, for such loads where load memory size is
less than ctx_field_size, verifier transforms it
to a full field load followed by proper masking.
. Currently, __sk_buff and bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period
are supporting narrowing loads.
. Narrower stores are still not allowed as typical ctx stores
are just normal stores.
Because of this change, some tests in verifier will fail and
these tests are removed. As a bonus, rename some out of bound
__sk_buff->cb access to proper field name and remove two
redundant "skb cb oob" tests.
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 1 +
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++------
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 21 +++++--
net/core/filter.c | 56 +++++++++++++-----
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 92 ++++-------------------------
6 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index c32bace..1bcbf0a 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_ops {
* with 'type' (read or write) is allowed
*/
bool (*is_valid_access)(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
- enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type);
+ enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type, int *ctx_field_size);
int (*gen_prologue)(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool direct_write,
const struct bpf_prog *prog);
u32 (*convert_ctx_access)(enum bpf_access_type type,
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index d5093b5..189741c 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ struct bpf_insn_aux_data {
enum bpf_reg_type ptr_type; /* pointer type for load/store insns */
struct bpf_map *map_ptr; /* pointer for call insn into lookup_elem */
};
+ int ctx_field_size; /* the ctx field size for load/store insns, maybe 0 */
};
#define MAX_USED_MAPS 64 /* max number of maps accessed by one eBPF program */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 519a614..44b97d9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -758,15 +758,26 @@ static int check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
}
/* check access to 'struct bpf_context' fields */
-static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int off, int size,
+static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, int off, int size,
enum bpf_access_type t, enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type)
{
+ int ctx_field_size = 0;
+
/* for analyzer ctx accesses are already validated and converted */
if (env->analyzer_ops)
return 0;
if (env->prog->aux->ops->is_valid_access &&
- env->prog->aux->ops->is_valid_access(off, size, t, reg_type)) {
+ env->prog->aux->ops->is_valid_access(off, size, t, reg_type, &ctx_field_size)) {
+ /* a non zero ctx_field_size indicates:
+ * . For this field, the prog type specific ctx conversion algorithm
+ * only supports whole field access.
+ * . This ctx access is a candiate for later verifier transformation
+ * to load the whole field and then apply a mask to get correct result.
+ */
+ if (ctx_field_size)
+ env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ctx_field_size = ctx_field_size;
+
/* remember the offset of last byte accessed in ctx */
if (env->prog->aux->max_ctx_offset < off + size)
env->prog->aux->max_ctx_offset = off + size;
@@ -868,7 +879,7 @@ static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
* if t==write && value_regno==-1, some unknown value is stored into memory
* if t==read && value_regno==-1, don't care what we read from memory
*/
-static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
+static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regno, int off,
int bpf_size, enum bpf_access_type t,
int value_regno)
{
@@ -911,7 +922,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
verbose("R%d leaks addr into ctx\n", value_regno);
return -EACCES;
}
- err = check_ctx_access(env, off, size, t, ®_type);
+ err = check_ctx_access(env, insn_idx, off, size, t, ®_type);
if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) {
mark_reg_unknown_value_and_range(state->regs,
value_regno);
@@ -972,7 +983,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
return err;
}
-static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
+static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_insn *insn)
{
struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
int err;
@@ -994,13 +1005,13 @@ static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
return err;
/* check whether atomic_add can read the memory */
- err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
+ err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ, -1);
if (err)
return err;
/* check whether atomic_add can write into the same memory */
- return check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
+ return check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1);
}
@@ -1416,7 +1427,7 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx)
* is inferred from register state.
*/
for (i = 0; i < meta.access_size; i++) {
- err = check_mem_access(env, meta.regno, i, BPF_B, BPF_WRITE, -1);
+ err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, meta.regno, i, BPF_B, BPF_WRITE, -1);
if (err)
return err;
}
@@ -2993,18 +3004,12 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
/* check that memory (src_reg + off) is readable,
* the state of dst_reg will be updated by this func
*/
- err = check_mem_access(env, insn->src_reg, insn->off,
+ err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->src_reg, insn->off,
BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ,
insn->dst_reg);
if (err)
return err;
- if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_W &&
- BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_DW) {
- insn_idx++;
- continue;
- }
-
prev_src_type = &env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ptr_type;
if (*prev_src_type == NOT_INIT) {
@@ -3032,7 +3037,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
enum bpf_reg_type *prev_dst_type, dst_reg_type;
if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_XADD) {
- err = check_xadd(env, insn);
+ err = check_xadd(env, insn_idx, insn);
if (err)
return err;
insn_idx++;
@@ -3051,7 +3056,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
dst_reg_type = regs[insn->dst_reg].type;
/* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */
- err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
+ err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE,
insn->src_reg);
if (err)
@@ -3080,7 +3085,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
return err;
/* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */
- err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
+ err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE,
-1);
if (err)
@@ -3383,7 +3388,7 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
struct bpf_insn insn_buf[16], *insn;
struct bpf_prog *new_prog;
enum bpf_access_type type;
- int i, cnt, delta = 0;
+ int i, cnt, off, size, ctx_field_size, is_narrower_load, delta = 0;
if (ops->gen_prologue) {
cnt = ops->gen_prologue(insn_buf, env->seen_direct_write,
@@ -3423,11 +3428,39 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ptr_type != PTR_TO_CTX)
continue;
+ off = insn->off;
+ size = bpf_size_to_bytes(BPF_SIZE(insn->code));
+ ctx_field_size = env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ctx_field_size;
+ is_narrower_load = (type == BPF_READ && size < ctx_field_size);
+
+ /* If the read access is a narrower load of the field,
+ * convert to a 4/8-byte load, to minimum program type specific
+ * convert_ctx_access changes. If conversion is successful,
+ * we will apply proper mask to the result.
+ */
+ if (is_narrower_load) {
+ int size_code = BPF_H;
+
+ if (ctx_field_size == 4)
+ size_code = BPF_W;
+ else if (ctx_field_size == 8)
+ size_code = BPF_DW;
+ insn->off = off & ~(ctx_field_size - 1);
+ insn->code = BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | size_code;
+ }
cnt = ops->convert_ctx_access(type, insn, insn_buf, env->prog);
if (cnt == 0 || cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf)) {
verbose("bpf verifier is misconfigured\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (is_narrower_load) {
+ if (ctx_field_size <= 4)
+ insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, insn->dst_reg,
+ (1 << size * 8) - 1);
+ else
+ insn_buf[cnt++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, insn->dst_reg,
+ (1 << size * 8) - 1);
+ }
new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
if (!new_prog)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 051d7fc..9d3ec82 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto *kprobe_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func
/* bpf+kprobe programs can access fields of 'struct pt_regs' */
static bool kprobe_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
- enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type)
+ enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type, int *ctx_field_size)
{
if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(struct pt_regs))
return false;
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto *tp_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
}
static bool tp_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
- enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type)
+ enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type, int *ctx_field_size)
{
if (off < sizeof(void *) || off >= PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE)
return false;
@@ -581,17 +581,26 @@ const struct bpf_verifier_ops tracepoint_prog_ops = {
};
static bool pe_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
- enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type)
+ enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type, int *ctx_field_size)
{
+ int sample_period_off;
+
if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(struct bpf_perf_event_data))
return false;
if (type != BPF_READ)
return false;
if (off % size != 0)
return false;
- if (off == offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data, sample_period)) {
- if (size != sizeof(u64))
- return false;
+
+ /* permit 1, 2, 4 byte narrower and 8 normal read access to sample_period */
+ sample_period_off = offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data, sample_period);
+ if (off >= sample_period_off && off < sample_period_off + sizeof(__u64)) {
+ *ctx_field_size = 8;
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ return (off & 0x7) == 0 && size <= 8 && (size & (size - 1)) == 0;
+#else
+ return ((off & 0x7) + size) == 8 && size <= 8 && (size & (size - 1)) == 0;
+#endif
} else {
if (size != sizeof(long))
return false;
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index a65a3b2..60ed6f3 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -2856,7 +2856,8 @@ lwt_xmit_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
}
}
-static bool __is_valid_access(int off, int size)
+static bool __is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
+ int *ctx_field_size)
{
if (off < 0 || off >= sizeof(struct __sk_buff))
return false;
@@ -2872,9 +2873,27 @@ static bool __is_valid_access(int off, int size)
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + sizeof(__u32))
return false;
break;
- default:
+ case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data) ...
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data) + sizeof(__u32) - 1:
+ case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end) ...
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end) + sizeof(__u32) - 1:
if (size != sizeof(__u32))
return false;
+ break;
+ default:
+ /* permit narrower load for not cb/data/data_end fields */
+ *ctx_field_size = 4;
+ if (type == BPF_WRITE) {
+ if (size != sizeof(__u32))
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ if (size != sizeof(__u32))
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+ return (off & 0x3) == 0 && (size == 1 || size == 2);
+#else
+ return (off & 0x3) + size == 4 && (size == 1 || size == 2);
+#endif
+ }
}
return true;
@@ -2882,12 +2901,16 @@ static bool __is_valid_access(int off, int size)
static bool sk_filter_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
enum bpf_access_type type,
- enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type)
+ enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type,
+ int *ctx_field_size)
{
switch (off) {
- case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid):
- case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data):
- case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end):
+ case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid) ...
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid) + sizeof(__u32) - 1:
+ case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data) ...
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data) + sizeof(__u32) - 1:
+ case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end) ...
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end) + sizeof(__u32) - 1:
return false;
}
@@ -2901,15 +2924,17 @@ static bool sk_filter_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
}
}
- return __is_valid_access(off, size);
+ return __is_valid_access(off, size, type, ctx_field_size);
}
static bool lwt_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
enum bpf_access_type type,
- enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type)
+ enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type,
+ int *ctx_field_size)
{
switch (off) {
- case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid):
+ case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid) ...
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid) + sizeof(__u32) - 1:
return false;
}
@@ -2934,12 +2959,13 @@ static bool lwt_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
break;
}
- return __is_valid_access(off, size);
+ return __is_valid_access(off, size, type, ctx_field_size);
}
static bool sock_filter_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
enum bpf_access_type type,
- enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type)
+ enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type,
+ int *ctx_field_size)
{
if (type == BPF_WRITE) {
switch (off) {
@@ -3002,7 +3028,8 @@ static int tc_cls_act_prologue(struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, bool direct_write,
static bool tc_cls_act_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
enum bpf_access_type type,
- enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type)
+ enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type,
+ int *ctx_field_size)
{
if (type == BPF_WRITE) {
switch (off) {
@@ -3027,7 +3054,7 @@ static bool tc_cls_act_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
break;
}
- return __is_valid_access(off, size);
+ return __is_valid_access(off, size, type, ctx_field_size);
}
static bool __is_valid_xdp_access(int off, int size)
@@ -3044,7 +3071,8 @@ static bool __is_valid_xdp_access(int off, int size)
static bool xdp_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
enum bpf_access_type type,
- enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type)
+ enum bpf_reg_type *reg_type,
+ int *ctx_field_size)
{
if (type == BPF_WRITE)
return false;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 4ee4708..1334170 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -1073,44 +1073,22 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
- "check cb access: byte, oob 1",
+ "__sk_buff->hash, offset 0, byte store not permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 4),
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash)),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
- "check cb access: byte, oob 2",
+ "__sk_buff->tc_index, offset 3, byte store not permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- },
- {
- "check cb access: byte, oob 3",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 4),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- },
- {
- "check cb access: byte, oob 4",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 1),
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_index) + 3),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
@@ -1188,44 +1166,22 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
},
{
- "check cb access: half, oob 1",
+ "check __sk_buff->hash, offset 0, half store not permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 4),
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash)),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
- "check cb access: half, oob 2",
+ "check __sk_buff->tc_index, offset 2, half store not permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 2),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- },
- {
- "check cb access: half, oob 3",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 4),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- },
- {
- "check cb access: half, oob 4",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 2),
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_index) + 2),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
@@ -1368,28 +1324,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
"check cb access: double, oob 2",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 8),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- },
- {
- "check cb access: double, oob 3",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 8),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- },
- {
- "check cb access: double, oob 4",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4])),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
@@ -1398,22 +1332,22 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
},
{
- "check cb access: double, oob 5",
+ "check __sk_buff->ifindex dw store not permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 8),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, ifindex)),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
- "check cb access: double, oob 6",
+ "check __sk_buff->ifindex dw load not permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 8),
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, ifindex)),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists