[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170613133540.tztr2e3xz5yl426p@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 21:35:40 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests/bpf: make correct use of exit codes
in bpf selftests
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:17:19PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>The selftests depend on using the shell exit code as a mean of
>detecting the success or failure of test-binary executed. The
>appropiate output "[PASS]" or "[FAIL]" in generated by
>tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk.
>
>Notice that the exit code is masked with 255. Thus, be careful if
>using the number of errors as the exits code, as 256 errors would be
nit pick:
s/exits/exit/
> printf("Summary: %d PASSED, %d FAILED\n", passes, errors);
>- return errors ? -errors : 0;
>+ return errors ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS;
Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Thanks,
Fengguang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists