[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170614.150357.632035401955794047.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:03:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ddaney@...iumnetworks.com
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, david.daney@...ium.com, ast@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] bpf: Changes needed (or desired) for MIPS support
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:54:03 -0700
> On 06/13/2017 05:22 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 06/14/2017 01:49 AM, David Daney wrote:
>>> This is a grab bag of changes to the bpf testing infrastructure I
>>> developed working on MIPS eBPF JIT support. The change to
>>> bpf_jit_disasm is probably universally beneficial, the others are more
>>> MIPS specific.
>> I think these could go independently through net-next tree?
>
> Yes, if davem is happy with them, I think that makes sense that he
> take them via net-next.
Series applied to net-next, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists