[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1497468613.7171.264.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:30:13 -0400
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, saeedm@...lanox.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
ilant@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [pull request][for-next 0/6] Mellanox mlx5 updates 2017-05-23
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 12:02 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
> Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 14:43:58 +0300
>
> > Hi Dave and Doug,
> >
> > This series introduces some small updates and FPGA support to the
> mlx5
> > core/ethernet and IB drivers.
> >
> > For more details please see below.
> >
> > Please pull and let me know if there's any problem.
>
> Ok, I've pulled this into net-next.
>
> Doug let me know if there are any merge hassles we need to coordinate
> on.
Turns out that you had pulled this prior to your net-next tree making
it up to v4.12-rc3, while I had my -rc branch based on v4.12-rc3, so
when I pulled just up to your merge commit for this pull request, it
meant a later merge of my -rc branch would pull in a bunch of stuff
between here and -rc3. So I ended up pulling your latest net-next as
of today as the easiest way to resolve that issue. Now I can merge my
-rc branch in and it won't cause any extra noise in the merge. It
seems to be a fairly regular pattern that I'm going to have to hold my
pull request to Linus until after your tree is pulled, so I might just
start planning on that from now on ;-)
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Powered by blists - more mailing lists