netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ipmr: add netlink notifications on igmpmsg cache reports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e1e0c9fc-a2c7-dc98-0255-4af5c69c8e9c@6wind.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 09:56:25 +0200
From:   Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:     Julien Gomes <julien@...sta.com>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ipmr: add netlink notifications on igmpmsg
 cache reports

Le 13/06/2017 à 19:08, Julien Gomes a écrit :
> Add Netlink notifications on cache reports in ipmr, in addition to the
> existing igmpmsg sent to mroute_sk.
> Send RTM_NEWCACHEREPORT notifications to RTNLGRP_IPV4_MROUTE.
> 
> MSGTYPE, VIF_ID, SRC_ADDR and DST_ADDR Netlink attributes contain the
> same data as their equivalent fields in the igmpmsg header.
> PKT attribute is the packet sent to mroute_sk, without the added igmpmsg
> header.
> 
> Suggested-by: Ryan Halbrook <halbrook@...sta.com>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Gomes <julien@...sta.com>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/mroute.h | 11 ++++++++
>  net/ipv4/ipmr.c             | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mroute.h b/include/uapi/linux/mroute.h
> index f904367c0cee..f6f9e01ee734 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/mroute.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/mroute.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,17 @@ enum {
>  };
>  #define IPMRA_VIFA_MAX (__IPMRA_VIFA_MAX - 1)
>  
> +/* ipmr netlink cache report attributes */
> +enum {
IPMRA_CACHEREPORTA_UNSPEC is missing.
By the way, maybe something shorter than IPMRA_CACHEREPORTA_ would be better.
What about IPMR_CREPORTA_? IPMR_CACHEA_? IPMR_IGMPA_? or whatever.
What is the signification of the two 'A'? One for 'attribute', but the other?

> +	IPMRA_CACHEREPORTA_MSGTYPE,
> +	IPMRA_CACHEREPORTA_VIF_ID,
> +	IPMRA_CACHEREPORTA_SRC_ADDR,
> +	IPMRA_CACHEREPORTA_DST_ADDR,
> +	IPMRA_CACHEREPORTA_PKT,
> +	__IPMRA_CACHEREPORTA_MAX
> +};
> +#define IPMRA_CACHEREPORTA_MAX (__IPMRA_CACHEREPORTA_MAX - 1)