[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170615.105803.1464863749922308353.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:58:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: lucien.xin@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, hannes@...essinduktion.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: fix calling in6_ifa_hold incorrectly for dad
work
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:33:58 +0800
> Now when starting the dad work in addrconf_mod_dad_work, if the dad work
> is idle and queued, it needs to hold ifa.
>
> The problem is there's one gap in [1], during which if the pending dad work
> is removed elsewhere. It will miss to hold ifa, but the dad word is still
> idea and queue.
>
> if (!delayed_work_pending(&ifp->dad_work))
> in6_ifa_hold(ifp);
> <--------------[1]
> mod_delayed_work(addrconf_wq, &ifp->dad_work, delay);
>
> An use-after-free issue can be caused by this.
>
> Chen Wei found this issue when WARN_ON(!hlist_unhashed(&ifp->addr_lst)) in
> net6_ifa_finish_destroy was hit because of it.
>
> As Hannes' suggestion, this patch is to fix it by holding ifa first in
> addrconf_mod_dad_work, then calling mod_delayed_work and putting ifa if
> the dad_work is already in queue.
>
> Note that this patch did not choose to fix it with:
>
> if (!mod_delayed_work(delay))
> in6_ifa_hold(ifp);
>
> As with it, when delay == 0, dad_work would be scheduled immediately, all
> addrconf_mod_dad_work(0) callings had to be moved under ifp->lock.
>
> Reported-by: Wei Chen <weichen@...hat.com>
> Suggested-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists