[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1497565045.2518.14.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:17:25 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] skbuff: make skb_put_zero() return void
On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 14:18 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 22:40 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 13:36 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > >
> > > Given you are adding a lot of these, it might be better
> > > to add an exported function that duplicates most of
> > > skb_put with a memset at the end.
> >
> > Yeah, could be done. I'm not sure why you'd want to duplicate it
> > rather
> > than call it though? To make it about as fast?
>
> Yeah, that and reduced stack use.
>
> Dunno how performance sensitive these uses really are
> but it seems some might be for slow cpu wireless APs in
> both the rx and tx paths.
I haven't really checked now, but the wireless (mac80211) ones I saw
weren't in the data TX/RX, only for management SKBs which are pretty
much a slowpath.
Anyway, I guess you know how to propose a patch with this :-)
However, I think in that case there should be something like
skb_pull_inline, so that the skb_put code here isn't all copied around,
but just lives in a single place that gets inlined into skb_put() and
skb_put_zero().
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists