netdev - [PATCH net] decnet: always not take dst->__refcnt when inserting dst into hash table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170616174637.139429-1-tracywwnj@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:46:37 -0700
From:   Wei Wang <tracywwnj@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] decnet: always not take dst->__refcnt when inserting dst into hash table

From: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>

In the existing dn_route.c code, dn_route_output_slow() takes
dst->__refcnt before calling dn_insert_route() while dn_route_input_slow()
does not take dst->__refcnt before calling dn_insert_route().
This makes the whole routing code very buggy.
In dn_dst_check_expire(), dnrt_free() is called when rt expires. This
makes the routes inserted by dn_route_output_slow() not able to be
freed as the refcnt is not released.
In dn_dst_gc(), dnrt_drop() is called to release rt which could
potentially cause the dst->__refcnt to be dropped to -1.
In dn_run_flush(), dst_free() is called to release all the dst. Again,
it makes the dst inserted by dn_route_output_slow() not able to be
released and also, it does not wait on the rcu and could potentially
cause crash in the path where other users still refer to this dst.

This patch makes sure both input and output path do not take
dst->__refcnt before calling dn_insert_route() and also makes sure
dnrt_free()/dst_free() is called when removing dst from the hash table.
The only difference between those 2 calls is that dnrt_free() waits on
the rcu while dst_free() does not.

Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
---
 net/decnet/dn_route.c | 14 ++++----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_route.c b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
index 4b9518a0d248..6f95612b4d32 100644
--- a/net/decnet/dn_route.c
+++ b/net/decnet/dn_route.c
@@ -188,12 +188,6 @@ static inline void dnrt_free(struct dn_route *rt)
 	call_rcu_bh(&rt->dst.rcu_head, dst_rcu_free);
 }

-static inline void dnrt_drop(struct dn_route *rt)
-{
-	dst_release(&rt->dst);
-	call_rcu_bh(&rt->dst.rcu_head, dst_rcu_free);
-}
-
 static void dn_dst_check_expire(unsigned long dummy)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -248,7 +242,7 @@ static int dn_dst_gc(struct dst_ops *ops)
 			}
 			*rtp = rt->dst.dn_next;
 			rt->dst.dn_next = NULL;
-			dnrt_drop(rt);
+			dnrt_free(rt);
 			break;
 		}
 		spin_unlock_bh(&dn_rt_hash_table[i].lock);
@@ -350,7 +344,7 @@ static int dn_insert_route(struct dn_route *rt, unsigned int hash, struct dn_rou
 			dst_use(&rth->dst, now);
 			spin_unlock_bh(&dn_rt_hash_table[hash].lock);

-			dnrt_drop(rt);
+			dst_free(&rt->dst);
 			*rp = rth;
 			return 0;
 		}
@@ -380,7 +374,7 @@ static void dn_run_flush(unsigned long dummy)
 		for(; rt; rt = next) {
 			next = rcu_dereference_raw(rt->dst.dn_next);
 			RCU_INIT_POINTER(rt->dst.dn_next, NULL);
-			dst_free((struct dst_entry *)rt);
+			dnrt_free(rt);
 		}

 nothing_to_declare:
@@ -1187,7 +1181,7 @@ static int dn_route_output_slow(struct dst_entry **pprt, const struct flowidn *o
 	if (dev_out->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK)
 		flags |= RTCF_LOCAL;

-	rt = dst_alloc(&dn_dst_ops, dev_out, 1, DST_OBSOLETE_NONE, DST_HOST);
+	rt = dst_alloc(&dn_dst_ops, dev_out, 0, DST_OBSOLETE_NONE, DST_HOST);
 	if (rt == NULL)
 		goto e_nobufs;

-- 
2.13.1.518.g3df882009-goog