[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1497642203.10546.16.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:43:23 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, johannes@...solutions.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] skb data accessors cleanup
On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 11:50 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:07:42 +0200
>
> > Over night, Fengguang's bot told me that it compiled all of its many
> > various configurations successfully, and I had done allyesconfig on
> > x86_64 myself yesterday to iron out the things I missed.
> >
> > So now I think I'm happy with it.
Nice work Johannes. thanks.
Next up: skb_push?
> Series applied, thanks!
David, it seems you applied the V2 version of
this patchset. When you
apply revised patches,
can you please reply to the V2 submission?
It's a bit confusing otherwise.
> I tell ya, spatch appears to be the crack cocaine of Linus kernel
> development. Once someone gets into some spatch scripting work,
> they can't stop!
True.
Sometimes I use cocci, sometimes I use regexes.
cocci is cool but it can still be pretty slow.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists