[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLUPR0701MB2004F40778215AD277D4FF348DC10@BLUPR0701MB2004.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:41:15 +0000
From: "Mintz, Yuval" <Yuval.Mintz@...ium.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "kbuild-all@...org" <kbuild-all@...org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kalderon, Michal" <Michal.Kalderon@...ium.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 4/7] qed*: Rename qede_roce.[ch]
> In file included from drivers/net//ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede.h:43:0,
> from drivers/net//ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_ptp.h:38,
> from drivers/net//ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_fp.c:43:
> >> include/linux/qed/qede_rdma.h:57:12: warning: 'struct pci_dev' declared
> inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> >> include/linux/qed/qede_rdma.h:57:12: warning: its scope is only this
> definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by
> default]
This patch is merely renaming qede_roce.h -> qede_rdma.h.
I guess the kbuild test robot got better scripts than the time we've added qede_rdma.h,
or else it would have catched the fact there are no inclusion since then.
Dave - given this is an existing warning exposed due to a rename [and not something
that actually got introduced in this patch], do you want us to fix it via v2 of this series?
Or send a fix for it later?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists