[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5943DCB6.6070205@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 15:27:18 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>, Blake Matheny <bmatheny@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v2 07/15] bpf: Add setsockopt helper function
to bpf
On 06/15/2017 10:08 PM, Lawrence Brakmo wrote:
> Added support for calling a subset of socket setsockopts from
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_OPS programs. The code was duplicated rather
> than making the changes to call the socket setsockopt function because
> the changes required would have been larger.
>
> The ops supported are:
> SO_RCVBUF
> SO_SNDBUF
> SO_MAX_PACING_RATE
> SO_PRIORITY
> SO_RCVLOWAT
> SO_MARK
>
> Signed-off-by: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 14 ++++++++-
> net/core/filter.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 3 ++
> 3 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index d945336..8accb4d 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -520,6 +520,17 @@ union bpf_attr {
> * Set full skb->hash.
> * @skb: pointer to skb
> * @hash: hash to set
> + *
> + * int bpf_setsockopt(bpf_socket, level, optname, optval, optlen)
> + * Calls setsockopt. Not all opts are available, only those with
> + * integer optvals plus TCP_CONGESTION.
> + * Supported levels: SOL_SOCKET and IPROTO_TCP
> + * @bpf_socket: pointer to bpf_socket
> + * @level: SOL_SOCKET or IPROTO_TCP
> + * @optname: option name
> + * @optval: pointer to option value
> + * @optlen: length of optval in byes
> + * Return: 0 or negative error
> */
> #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN) \
> FN(unspec), \
> @@ -570,7 +581,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
> FN(probe_read_str), \
> FN(get_socket_cookie), \
> FN(get_socket_uid), \
> - FN(set_hash),
> + FN(set_hash), \
> + FN(setsockopt),
>
> /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
> * function eBPF program intends to call
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 7466f55..9ff567c 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
> #include <net/dst.h>
> #include <net/sock_reuseport.h>
> #include <net/busy_poll.h>
> +#include <net/tcp.h>
>
> /**
> * sk_filter_trim_cap - run a packet through a socket filter
> @@ -2671,6 +2672,69 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_socket_uid_proto = {
> .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
> };
>
> +BPF_CALL_5(bpf_setsockopt, struct bpf_socket_ops_kern *, bpf_socket,
> + int, level, int, optname, char *, optval, int, optlen)
> +{
> + struct sock *sk = bpf_socket->sk;
> + int ret = 0;
> + int val;
> +
> + if (bpf_socket->is_req_sock)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (level == SOL_SOCKET) {
> + /* Only some socketops are supported */
> + val = *((int *)optval);
> +
> + switch (optname) {
> + case SO_RCVBUF:
> + sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK;
> + sk->sk_rcvbuf = max_t(int, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF);
> + break;
> + case SO_SNDBUF:
> + sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK;
> + sk->sk_sndbuf = max_t(int, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF);
> + break;
> + case SO_MAX_PACING_RATE:
> + sk->sk_max_pacing_rate = val;
> + sk->sk_pacing_rate = min(sk->sk_pacing_rate,
> + sk->sk_max_pacing_rate);
> + break;
> + case SO_PRIORITY:
> + sk->sk_priority = val;
> + break;
> + case SO_RCVLOWAT:
> + if (val < 0)
> + val = INT_MAX;
> + sk->sk_rcvlowat = val ? : 1;
> + break;
> + case SO_MARK:
> + sk->sk_mark = val;
> + break;
Likely all of the above, I think we could make programs even more
flexible if these are members in the context struct itself, so
that socket_ops_convert_ctx_access() would translate them inline
w/o even needing a helper call with the bonus of having read and
write access.
But what about socket lock that we otherwise have in sock_setsockopt()?
Could we add a sock_owned_by_me(sk) to tcp_call_bpf() to really assert
this for all cases, so that lockdep complains should it ever be not
the case?
> + default:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> + } else if (level == SOL_TCP &&
> + bpf_socket->sk->sk_prot->setsockopt == tcp_setsockopt) {
> + /* Place holder */
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_setsockopt_proto = {
> + .func = bpf_setsockopt,
> + .gpl_only = true,
> + .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
> + .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
> + .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
> + .arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
> + .arg4_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM,
> + .arg5_type = ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
> +};
> +
> static const struct bpf_func_proto *
> bpf_base_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
> {
> @@ -2822,6 +2886,17 @@ lwt_inout_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
> }
>
> static const struct bpf_func_proto *
> + socket_ops_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
> +{
> + switch (func_id) {
> + case BPF_FUNC_setsockopt:
> + return &bpf_setsockopt_proto;
> + default:
> + return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static const struct bpf_func_proto *
> lwt_xmit_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
> {
> switch (func_id) {
> @@ -3565,7 +3640,7 @@ const struct bpf_verifier_ops cg_sock_prog_ops = {
> };
>
> const struct bpf_verifier_ops socket_ops_prog_ops = {
> - .get_func_proto = bpf_base_func_proto,
> + .get_func_proto = socket_ops_func_proto,
> .is_valid_access = socket_ops_is_valid_access,
> .convert_ctx_access = socket_ops_convert_ctx_access,
> };
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
> index f4840b8..d50ac34 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
> +++ b/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
> @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ static unsigned long long (*bpf_get_prandom_u32)(void) =
> (void *) BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32;
> static int (*bpf_xdp_adjust_head)(void *ctx, int offset) =
> (void *) BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_head;
> +static int (*bpf_setsockopt)(void *ctx, int level, int optname, void *optval,
> + int optlen) =
> + (void *) BPF_FUNC_setsockopt;
>
> /* llvm builtin functions that eBPF C program may use to
> * emit BPF_LD_ABS and BPF_LD_IND instructions
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists