lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f78d2a7c-3dc1-009c-9b06-37ed8e87090e@mellanox.com>
Date:   Sun, 18 Jun 2017 11:32:10 +0300
From:   Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
To:     Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
Subject: RXFH manual configuration

Hi Jacob,

I am looking at your patch:
d4ab4286276f ethtool: correctly ensure {GS}CHANNELS doesn't conflict ...

I wonder - if I want to configure the number of channels (ethtool -L), 
without being aware to the history of indirection table (manually set or 
not), how can I know what is the expected behavior?
I should be able, from userspace, to query the value of 
netif_is_rxfh_configured() in order to decide whether the outcome of an 
ethtool -L command is correct or not.

Do you know if this indication exists?

Thanks,
Tariq

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ