netdev - [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] vxlan: fix snooping for link-local IPv6 addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <df6d72176502df802508c2525d5edb25b38e18b4.1497825555.git.mschiffer@universe-factory.net>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2017 10:03:59 +0200
From:   Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@...verse-factory.net>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, jbenc@...hat.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
        pshelar@....org, aduyck@...antis.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] vxlan: fix snooping for link-local IPv6 addresses

If VXLAN is run over link-local IPv6 addresses, it is necessary to store
the ifindex in the FDB entries. Otherwise, the used interface is undefined
and unicast communication will most likely fail.

Support for link-local IPv4 addresses should be possible as well, but as
the semantics aren't as well defined as for IPv6, and there doesn't seem to
be much interest in having the support, it's not implemented for now.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <mschiffer@...verse-factory.net>
---

Notes:
    v2: use u32 instead of __u32
    v3: rebase, add note about IPv4 to commit message

 drivers/net/vxlan.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
index d6d57317cbd5..45a8a5475f3d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
@@ -957,16 +957,24 @@ static int vxlan_fdb_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb,
  */
 static bool vxlan_snoop(struct net_device *dev,
 			union vxlan_addr *src_ip, const u8 *src_mac,
-			__be32 vni)
+			u32 src_ifindex, __be32 vni)
 {
 	struct vxlan_dev *vxlan = netdev_priv(dev);
 	struct vxlan_fdb *f;
+	u32 ifindex = 0;
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+	if (src_ip->sa.sa_family == AF_INET6 &&
+	    (ipv6_addr_type(&src_ip->sin6.sin6_addr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL))
+		ifindex = src_ifindex;
+#endif
 
 	f = vxlan_find_mac(vxlan, src_mac, vni);
 	if (likely(f)) {
 		struct vxlan_rdst *rdst = first_remote_rcu(f);
 
-		if (likely(vxlan_addr_equal(&rdst->remote_ip, src_ip)))
+		if (likely(vxlan_addr_equal(&rdst->remote_ip, src_ip) &&
+			   rdst->remote_ifindex == ifindex))
 			return false;
 
 		/* Don't migrate static entries, drop packets */
@@ -993,7 +1001,7 @@ static bool vxlan_snoop(struct net_device *dev,
 					 vxlan->cfg.dst_port,
 					 vni,
 					 vxlan->default_dst.remote_vni,
-					 0, NTF_SELF);
+					 ifindex, NTF_SELF);
 		spin_unlock(&vxlan->hash_lock);
 	}
 
@@ -1264,6 +1272,7 @@ static bool vxlan_set_mac(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
 			  struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 vni)
 {
 	union vxlan_addr saddr;
+	u32 ifindex = skb->dev->ifindex;
 
 	skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
 	skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, vxlan->dev);
@@ -1285,7 +1294,7 @@ static bool vxlan_set_mac(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
 	}
 
 	if ((vxlan->cfg.flags & VXLAN_F_LEARN) &&
-	    vxlan_snoop(skb->dev, &saddr, eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, vni))
+	    vxlan_snoop(skb->dev, &saddr, eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, ifindex, vni))
 		return false;
 
 	return true;
@@ -1994,7 +2003,8 @@ static void vxlan_encap_bypass(struct sk_buff *skb, struct vxlan_dev *src_vxlan,
 	}
 
 	if (dst_vxlan->cfg.flags & VXLAN_F_LEARN)
-		vxlan_snoop(skb->dev, &loopback, eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, vni);
+		vxlan_snoop(skb->dev, &loopback, eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, 0,
+			    vni);
 
 	u64_stats_update_begin(&tx_stats->syncp);
 	tx_stats->tx_packets++;
-- 
2.13.1