netdev - Re: [PATCH] Convert BUG_ON to WARN_ON in bond

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 23:27:41 +0100
From:   Michael J Dilmore <michael.j.dilmore@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     jay.vosburgh@...onical.com, vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        joe@...ches.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert BUG_ON to WARN_ON in bond_options.c

On 21/06/17 22:56, David Miller wrote:

> From: Michael D <michael.j.dilmore@...il.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 22:41:07 +0100
>
>> I don't think you can stop it being dereferenced... you just need to
>> prevent an attacker from exploiting the null pointer dereference
>> vulnerability right? And this is done by returning the function right
>> away?
> What's all of this about an "attacker"?
>
> If there is a bug, we dererence a NULL pointer, and we should
> fix that bug.
>
> The BUG_ON() helps us see where the problem is while at the
> same time stopping the kernel before the NULL deref happens.
Ok this is starting to make sense now - went a bit off track but think 
my general thinking is ok - i.e. if we return the function with an error 
code before the dereference then this basically does the same thing as 
BUG_ON but without crashing the kernel.

Something like:

if (WARN_ON(!new_active_slave) {
     netdev_dbg("Can't add new active slave - pointer null");
     return ERROR_CODE
}