[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170621075152.GA15996@amd>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:51:52 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
"patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>,
"adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions
Hi!
> > I agree with that but not the android guys. They seem to mandate an RTC
> > that can store time from 01/01/1970. I don't know much more than that
> > because they never cared to explain why that was actually necessary
> > (apart from a laconic "this will result in a bad user experience")
> >
> > I think tglx had a plan for offsetting the time at some point so 32-bit
> > platform can pass 2038 properly.
>
> Yes, but there are still quite some issues to solve there:
>
> 1) How do you tell the system that it should apply the offset in the
> first place, i.e at boot time before NTP or any other mechanism can
> correct it?
I'd not do offset. Instead, I'd select a threshold (perhaps year of
release of given kernel?) and
if (rtc_time < year_of_release_of_kernel)
rtc_time += 0x100000000;
Ok, we'll have to move away from "rtc_time == 0 indicates zero", as
seen in some drivers.
> 2) Deal with creative vendors who have their own idea about the 'start
> of the epoch'
If someone uses different threshold, well, there will be
confusion. But only for users that have their rtc set to the past,
which is quite unusual.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists