netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170621093549.GQ4902@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:35:49 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:     Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
        "patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com" 
        <patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        "linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        "rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>,
        "adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
        <adi-buildroot-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
        Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:26:51AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux
> > Sent: 20 June 2017 22:16
> ..
> > Consider that at the moment, we define the 32-bit RTC representation to
> > start at a well known epoch.  We _could_ decide that when it wraps to
> > 0x80000000 seconds, we'll define the lower 0x40000000 seconds to mean
> > dates in the future - and keep rolling that forward each time we cross
> > another 0x40000000 seconds.  Unless someone invents a real time machine,
> > we shouldn't need to set a modern RTC back to 1970.
> 
> True, just treating the value as unsigned gives another 67 years.

We _already_ do treat it as an unsigned number, so already the panicing
about 2038 is complete and utter nonsense - that's why I've been
consistently stating the 2106 date.

> If a 32bit RTC is programmed with the low 32bits of the 64bit 'seconds
> since 1970' the kernel should have no real difficulty sorting out the
> high bits from other available information.

Right, but converting all the 32-bit conversion functions to 64-bit
means that rather than "sorting out" that from the core RTC driver,
we have to implement solutions in each and every driver.

While that may appear to be a good idea, many RTCs that are 32-bit
counters do not themselves have additional non-volatile storage, so
it means that we're ending up with a lot of RTC specific hacks to
go and get the additional information from some other driver elsewhere
in the system.

> Problems with things like the x86 bios setting the rtc to stupid values
> are another matter.

Forget x86, the RTC there does not store time as a 32-bit integer, it's
stored as its component values, and there's non-volatile memory attached
to the RTC.  Hence, it's out of scope of "what to do about RTCs that
store time in 32-bit format" and also out of scope of "what to do about
RTC drivers that use the 32-bit time conversion function."

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.