[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170622.110723.1095460318299544942.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:07:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com,
dsahern@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Patch net] ipv6: only call ip6_route_dev_notify() once for
NETDEV_UNREGISTER
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:42:27 -0700
> In commit 242d3a49a2a1 ("ipv6: reorder ip6_route_dev_notifier after ipv6_dev_notf")
> I assumed NETDEV_REGISTER and NETDEV_UNREGISTER are paired,
> unfortunately, as reported by jeffy, netdev_wait_allrefs()
> could rebroadcast NETDEV_UNREGISTER event until all refs are
> gone.
>
> We have to add an additional check to avoid this corner case.
> For netdev_wait_allrefs() dev->reg_state is NETREG_UNREGISTERED,
> for dev_change_net_namespace(), dev->reg_state is
> NETREG_REGISTERED. So check for dev->reg_state != NETREG_UNREGISTERED.
>
> Fixes: 242d3a49a2a1 ("ipv6: reorder ip6_route_dev_notifier after ipv6_dev_notf")
> Reported-by: jeffy <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists