[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <269605029.27220992.1498504897374.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 15:21:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lance Richardson <lrichard@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Suryaputra Lin <stephen.suryaputra.lin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Faster TCP keepalive
> From: "Stephen Suryaputra Lin" <stephen.suryaputra.lin@...il.com>
> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Sent: Friday, 23 June, 2017 3:58:17 PM
> Subject: Faster TCP keepalive
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm writing this to probe if there has been thoughts or efforts in
> allowing sub-second TCP keep alive interval? One application is for TCP
> connections between IP hosts connected by an internal backplane where a
> faster detection is a necessity and the increased traffic can be
> accommodated.
>
> Suggestions on other ways to quickly tearing down TCP connections to a
> rebooted host in the application above are welcomed.
>
For quickly tearing down TCP connections to a host that has been rebooted,
avoiding e.g. waiting for TCP max retransmit count to be reached), you
could use SOCK_DESTROY (as e.g. iproute2's "ss -K [ FILTER ]" does).
Regards,
Lance
> Thank you,
>
> Stephen.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists