[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1498531618.24295.57.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 19:46:58 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ip_tables: remove useless variable
assignment in get_info()
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 17:34 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Value assigned to variable _ret_ at line 970 is overwritten either at
> line 986 or 988, before it can be used. This makes such variable
> assignment useless.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1226932
[]
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
[]
> @@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ static int get_info(struct net *net, void __user *user,
> struct xt_table_info tmp;
>
> if (compat) {
> - ret = compat_table_info(private, &tmp);
> + compat_table_info(private, &tmp);
why isn't it more appropriate to test the return value?
> xt_compat_flush_offsets(AF_INET);
> private = &tmp;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists