netdev - Re: [PATCH] datapath: Avoid using stack larger than 1024.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <db35e98f-5d2c-f0f4-d52b-cdfa42c08410@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:38:35 -0700
From:   Greg Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>
To:     Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, pravin shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] datapath: Avoid using stack larger than 1024.

On 06/27/2017 12:03 AM, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> When compiling OvS-master on 4.4.0-81 kernel,
> there is a warning:
>
>      CC [M]  /root/ovs/datapath/linux/datapath.o
>      /root/ovs/datapath/linux/datapath.c: In function
>      ‘ovs_flow_cmd_set’:
>      /root/ovs/datapath/linux/datapath.c:1221:1: warning:
>      the frame size of 1040 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
>      [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>
> This patch use kmalloc to malloc mem for sw_flow_mask and
> avoid using stack.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
> ---
>   datapath/datapath.c | 11 ++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/datapath/datapath.c b/datapath/datapath.c
> index c85029c..da8cd68 100644
> --- a/datapath/datapath.c
> +++ b/datapath/datapath.c
> @@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>       struct ovs_header *ovs_header = info->userhdr;
>       struct sw_flow_key key;
>       struct sw_flow *flow;
> -    struct sw_flow_mask mask;
> +    struct sw_flow_mask *mask;
>       struct sk_buff *reply = NULL;
>       struct datapath *dp;
>       struct sw_flow_actions *old_acts = NULL, *acts = NULL;
> @@ -1120,7 +1120,11 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>
>       ufid_present = ovs_nla_get_ufid(&sfid, a[OVS_FLOW_ATTR_UFID], log);
>       if (a[OVS_FLOW_ATTR_KEY]) {
> -        ovs_match_init(&match, &key, true, &mask);
> +        mask = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sw_flow_mask), GFP_KERNEL);
> +        if (!mask)
> +            return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +        ovs_match_init(&match, &key, true, mask);
>           error = ovs_nla_get_match(net, &match, a[OVS_FLOW_ATTR_KEY],
>                         a[OVS_FLOW_ATTR_MASK], log);
>       } else if (!ufid_present) {
> @@ -1141,7 +1145,7 @@ static int ovs_flow_cmd_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>           }
>
>           acts = get_flow_actions(net, a[OVS_FLOW_ATTR_ACTIONS], &key,
> -                    &mask, log);
> +                    mask, log);
>           if (IS_ERR(acts)) {
>               error = PTR_ERR(acts);
>               goto error;
> @@ -1216,6 +1220,7 @@ err_unlock_ovs:
>   err_kfree_acts:
>       ovs_nla_free_flow_actions(acts);
>   error:
> +    kfree(mask);
>       return error;
>   }
>
>
It looks fine to me but let's copy the maintainer Pravin

- Greg