[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170627092129.GR1248@mtr-leonro.local>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 12:21:29 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Ariel Almog <ariela@...lanox.com>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
Linux RDMA <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 3/5] rdma: Add device capability parsing
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 07:06:04AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:36:10PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:21:03PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:29:24PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 09:21:26PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add parsing interface for the device capability flags
> > > > >
> > > > > $ rdma dev show
> > > > > 1: mlx5_0: caps 0x1257e1c26
> > > >
> > > > This seems very un ip-like. I wouldn't show an undecoded hex value
> > > > like that, it isn't really useful.
> > >
> > > It is first supported field, after new fields will be added, we will
> > > have very similar to ip interface.
> > >
> > > 1: mlx5_0: caps 0x1257e1c2 key_1 val_1 key_2 val_2 ....
> > >
> > > The values are presented as is can be usable as an input for different scripts.
> >
> > I still wouldn't show an undecoded hex value.. It isn't useful.
> >
> > > > > $ rdma dev show mlx5_4 caps
> > > > > 5: mlx5_4: caps 0x1257e1c26
> > > > > Bit Description
> > > > > 01 DEVICE_BAD_PKEY_CNTR
> > > > > 02 DEVICE_BAD_QKEY_CNTR
> > > >
> > > > This table also seems un ip-like, the usual format is a list of words,
> > > > I think.
> > >
> > > It is true for key<->value data, but it is less obvious for bit
> > > parsing.
> >
> > Several of the word decodes are from bit fields..
> >
> > > Internally, I tried to present them as list and it was ugly like hell
> > > without any chance (without extra parsing) to actual see if specific
> > > capability is present or no.
> >
> > lspci seems to have no problem being readable while doing this..
>
> No problem,
> If i understand you correctly, you are suggesting to drop parsing of
> "caps" as a separate command and embed it into general show <devname>.
>
> Can you help me and give an example of how would you present those caps?
> What will be the output of such command?
> $ rdma dev show mlx5_4
ip-like style:
$ rdma dev show mlx5_4
5: mlx5_4:
caps: <BAD_PKEY_CNTR, BAD_QKEY_CNTR, CHANGE_PHY_PORT, PORT_ACTIVE_EVENT, SYS_IMAGE_GUID, RC_RNR_NAK_GEN, MEM_WINDOW, UD_IP_CSUM, UD_TSO, XRC, MEM_MGT_EXTENSIONS, BLOCK_MULTICAST_LOOPBACK, MEM_WINDOW_TYPE_2B, RAW_IP_CSUM, SIGNATURE_HANDOVER, VIRTUAL_FUNCTION>
$ rdma link show mlx5_3
4/1: mlx5_3/1:
caps: <CM, IP_BASED_GIDS>
Thanks
>
> Thanks
>
> >
> > Jason
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists