netdev - [PATCH net-next] bpf: Fix out-of-bound access on interpreters[]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170628174124.1545332-1-kafai@fb.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jun 2017 10:41:24 -0700
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] bpf: Fix out-of-bound access on interpreters[]

The index is off-by-one when fp->aux->stack_depth
has already been rounded up to 32.  In particular,
if stack_depth is 512, the index will be 16.

The fix is to round_up and then takes -1 instead of round_down.

[   22.318680] ==================================================================
[   22.319745] BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x48a/0x670
[   22.320737] Read of size 8 at addr ffffffff82aadae0 by task sockex3/1946
[   22.321646]
[   22.321858] CPU: 1 PID: 1946 Comm: sockex3 Tainted: G        W       4.12.0-rc6-01680-g2ee87db3a287 #22
[   22.323061] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-1.el7.centos 04/01/2014
[   22.324260] Call Trace:
[   22.324612]  dump_stack+0x67/0x99
[   22.325081]  print_address_description+0x1e8/0x290
[   22.325734]  ? bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x48a/0x670
[   22.326360]  kasan_report+0x265/0x350
[   22.326860]  __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x19/0x20
[   22.327484]  bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x48a/0x670
[   22.328109]  bpf_prog_load+0x626/0xd40
[   22.328637]  ? __bpf_prog_charge+0xc0/0xc0
[   22.329222]  ? check_nnp_nosuid.isra.61+0x100/0x100
[   22.329890]  ? __might_fault+0xf6/0x1b0
[   22.330446]  ? lock_acquire+0x360/0x360
[   22.331013]  SyS_bpf+0x67c/0x24d0
[   22.331491]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[   22.332049]  ? __getnstimeofday64+0xaf/0x1c0
[   22.332635]  ? bpf_prog_get+0x20/0x20
[   22.333135]  ? __audit_syscall_entry+0x300/0x600
[   22.333770]  ? syscall_trace_enter+0x540/0xdd0
[   22.334339]  ? exit_to_usermode_loop+0xe0/0xe0
[   22.334950]  ? do_syscall_64+0x48/0x410
[   22.335446]  ? bpf_prog_get+0x20/0x20
[   22.335954]  do_syscall_64+0x181/0x410
[   22.336454]  entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
[   22.337121] RIP: 0033:0x7f263fe81f19
[   22.337618] RSP: 002b:00007ffd9a3440c8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
[   22.338619] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000aac5fb RCX: 00007f263fe81f19
[   22.339600] RDX: 0000000000000030 RSI: 00007ffd9a3440d0 RDI: 0000000000000005
[   22.340470] RBP: 0000000000a9a1e0 R08: 0000000000a9a1e0 R09: 0000009d00000001
[   22.341430] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000010000
[   22.342411] R13: 0000000000a9a023 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000003
[   22.343369]
[   22.343593] The buggy address belongs to the variable:
[   22.344241]  interpreters+0x80/0x980
[   22.344708]
[   22.344908] Memory state around the buggy address:
[   22.345556]  ffffffff82aad980: 00 00 00 04 fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa
[   22.346449]  ffffffff82aada00: 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00
[   22.347361] >ffffffff82aada80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa
[   22.348301]                                                        ^
[   22.349142]  ffffffff82aadb00: 00 01 fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[   22.350058]  ffffffff82aadb80: 00 00 07 fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 05 fa fa fa fa fa
[   22.350984] ==================================================================

Fixes: b870aa901f4b ("bpf: use different interpreter depending on required stack size")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
---
 kernel/bpf/core.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index 774069ca18a7..ad5f55922a13 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1297,7 +1297,9 @@ static int bpf_check_tail_call(const struct bpf_prog *fp)
  */
 struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_select_runtime(struct bpf_prog *fp, int *err)
 {
-	fp->bpf_func = interpreters[round_down(fp->aux->stack_depth, 32) / 32];
+	u32 stack_depth = max_t(u32, fp->aux->stack_depth, 1);
+
+	fp->bpf_func = interpreters[(round_up(stack_depth, 32) / 32) - 1];
 
 	/* eBPF JITs can rewrite the program in case constant
 	 * blinding is active. However, in case of error during
-- 
2.9.3