[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170629.122349.2265868886957558079.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 12:23:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: clabbe.montjoie@...il.com
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, wens@...e.org,
peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
andre.przywara@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] net: stmmac: support future possible different
internal phy mode
From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:28:01 +0200
> The current way to find if the phy is internal is to compare DT phy-mode
> and emac_variant/internal_phy.
> But it will negate a possible future SoC where an external PHY use the
> same phy mode than the internal one.
>
> By using phy-mode = "internal" we permit to have an external PHY with
> the same mode than the internal one.
>
> Reported-by: André Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Series applied.
Please provide a proper "[PATCH 0/n] " header posting next time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists