[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1498780894-8253-26-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:01:34 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
dave@...olabs.net, manfred@...orfullife.com, tj@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, will.deacon@....com,
peterz@...radead.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
parri.andrea@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
<linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 26/26] xtensa: Remove spin_unlock_wait() arch-specific definitions
There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics,
and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock
pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific
arch_spin_unlock_wait().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
Cc: <linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>
---
arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h
index a36221cf6363..3bb49681ee24 100644
--- a/arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -33,11 +33,6 @@
#define arch_spin_is_locked(x) ((x)->slock != 0)
-static inline void arch_spin_unlock_wait(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
- smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->slock, !VAL);
-}
-
#define arch_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_spin_lock(lock)
static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
--
2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists