[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3B_-0-7BhbJG_Dni7qpNwy5qNgBeKW2X7R7V6Bujf4zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 09:21:53 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
Cc: Ilan Tayari <ilant@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
Kamal Heib <kamalh@...lanox.com>,
Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...lanox.com>,
Mohamad Haj Yahia <mohamad@...lanox.com>,
Aviv Heller <avivh@...lanox.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [net-next] net/mlx5: include wq.o in non-ethernet build
for FPGA
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Saeed Mahameed
<saeedm@....mellanox.co.il> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Ilan Tayari <ilant@...lanox.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/Makefile
>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/Makefile
>>>> index ca367445f864..50fe9e3c5dc2 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/Makefile
>>>> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ mlx5_core-y := main.o cmd.o debugfs.o fw.o eq.o uar.o
>>>> pagealloc.o \
>>>> mlx5_core-$(CONFIG_MLX5_ACCEL) += accel/ipsec.o
>>>>
>>>> mlx5_core-$(CONFIG_MLX5_FPGA) += fpga/cmd.o fpga/core.o fpga/conn.o
>>>> fpga/sdk.o \
>>>> - fpga/ipsec.o
>>>> + fpga/ipsec.o wq.o
>>>
>>> I believe we would prefer to move wq.o to mlx5_core-y.
>>> Otherwise you might build it twice.
>>
>> That's not a problem, Kbuild is smart enough to drop duplicate object files
>> that get built into the same module.
>>
>> If you think it's less confusing to readers of this file if it gets
>> put into core,
>> that's fine though, the only downside would be adding a little bit of
>> code bloat for users that want neither the ethernet nor the fpga code
>> (if that is a realistic use case).
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Thanks for the patch, your solution is good enough, but let's avoid
> confusing developers with such duplications.
> since the Makefile might get messy if we will keep using this method.
>
> I suggest to move wq.o to core or make MLX5_FPGA depend on MLX5_CORE_EN.
> I will discuss this with Ilan and we will provide the fix ASAP.
Ok, sounds good. Thanks!
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists