[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJnGfmDYcistcx-o3MmKaB1vn8Fav62JURk9epYEOiTRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 15:38:20 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm: eBPF JIT compiler
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Shubham Bansal
> <illusionist.neo@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi Russell,Daniel and Kees,
>>
>> I am attaching the latest patch with this mail. It included support
>> for BPF_CALL | BPF_JMP tested with and without constant blinding on
>> ARMv7 machine.
>> Due to the limitation on my machine I can't test the tail call. It
>> would be a great help if any of you could help me with this.
>
> Is this just a matter of running test_bpf?
If so:
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
test_bpf: Summary: 316 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [287/308 JIT'ed]
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists