[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUXxHU8JaO0riJ7h7hJpCwAw27titTfo3Ox6CqO3i8E9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:55:53 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v 1/2] ravb: Add support for r8a7743 SoC
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Chris Paterson
<Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com> wrote:
>> From: geert.uytterhoeven@...il.com
>> [mailto:geert.uytterhoeven@...il.com] On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven
>> Sent: 05 July 2017 14:47
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com> wrote:
>> > Add support for Gigabit Ethernet E-MAC on r8a7743 (RZ/G1M) SoC.
>> > Renesas RZ/G1M (R8A7743) SoC Ethernet AVB IP is identical to the R-Car
>> > Gen2 family.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Chris Paterson <chris.paterson2@...esas.com>
>>
>> Thanks for your patch!
>>
>> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
>> > @@ -1869,6 +1869,7 @@ static int ravb_mdio_release(struct ravb_private
>> > *priv) }
>> >
>> > static const struct of_device_id ravb_match_table[] = {
>> > + { .compatible = "renesas,etheravb-r8a7743", .data = (void
>> > + *)RCAR_GEN2 },
>> > { .compatible = "renesas,etheravb-r8a7790", .data = (void
>> *)RCAR_GEN2 },
>> > { .compatible = "renesas,etheravb-r8a7794", .data = (void
>> *)RCAR_GEN2 },
>> > { .compatible = "renesas,etheravb-rcar-gen2", .data = (void
>> > *)RCAR_GEN2 },
>>
>> As Sergei already mentioned, a driver update is not needed due to the
>> presence of family-specific compatible values.
>> Please drop that part, and you can add my:
>> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>
> Should the other compatible values (r8a7790, 94 etc) be removed then? Or are they needed for backwards compatibility?
The other compatible values in DT bindings and DTS files should be kept,
to allow handling of SoC-specific quirks if/when they are ever detected.
The other compatible values in the driver should be kept for
backwards-compatibility with old DTB files that lack the (newer)
family-specific compatible values.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists